dagfella:

SLAM HIM INTO T H E  F O U R T H  D I M E N S I O N

dagfella:

SLAM HIM INTO T H E  F O U R T H  D I M E N S I O N

(Source: socpens)

(Source: thecatsmustbecrazy)

(Source: )


what ur average tragedy looks like after 100 years

what ur average tragedy looks like after 100 years

(Source: lnternetporn)

(Source: tepitome)

lappanna:

sizvideos:

Video

THIS IS HILARIOUS

stresscomic:

Dub Reggae and Runescape.

stresscomic:

Dub Reggae and Runescape.

brashycouture:

October 18, 2014 at 05:54AM

brashycouture:

October 18, 2014 at 05:54AM

sloth-grunge:

*sees dog while in the car*

*turns around in seat to watch dog until its out of sight* 

(Source: paris666hilton)

(x)

(Source: cr1tikal)

Anonymous said: the fucks gamergate anyway?

oscob:

null-entry:

oscob:

null-entry:

oscob:

null-entry:

oscob:

mouth breathers fighting for their right to send death threats to women who want to speak their mind

Actually, it’s about responding to unfair criticism of games and gamers perpetrated by illogical, slanderous journalists and dishonest critics.

image

Thanks for illustrating what a petulant child you are.

image

Since you’re obviously either unable or unwilling to actually engage in a dialogue about this subject in any sort of intelligent way and rely on insults and generalizations in order to drive a point, I’m gonna go ahead and dismiss you and your answer.

People, this is the kind of thing that makes the world worse for everyone. And no, this is not justified by other people being asses, either. You either take it seriously and show exactly what the problem is or you are not being constructive. This is really disappointing to me because I know that there are legitimate criticisms of GamerGate out there and this kind of response is exactly what drives the trolling, generalizations and harassment on both sides.

"lol crybaby" is not a refutation of either side. I really hope in the future that you and people like you learn to grow up and actually address things that you find incorrect, unethical, etc. in a reasonable manner that might actually explain something to people and attract logical people to your view. As it is, you are being actively harmful to both the dialogue space and your own viewpoint, because this kind of petulant name-calling makes you and people that choose to associate with you look like substanceless kiddos on the internet instead of an actual thinking human being.

I almost hope that this is a false flag, because I don’t like the idea that there are people out there that think that mockery and dismissal are actual ways to deal with subjects like this.

I will have no further dialogue here if there is not a reasonable answer that can show me something that isn’t someone acting like a crybaby.

image

(Source: cyberjock)

chickenstab:

fuuckh8:

i corrupted the image file but the cat is almost 100% in tact and has that smug fucking grin like “haha fuckr cant do shit” fuck you cat fuck you fucking grey cat piece of shit cat

thI S IS MY FAVORITE IMAGE

chickenstab:

fuuckh8:

i corrupted the image file but the cat is almost 100% in tact and has that smug fucking grin like “haha fuckr cant do shit” fuck you cat fuck you fucking grey cat piece of shit cat

thI S IS MY FAVORITE IMAGE